.
Feedback

Bill Clinton's Speech and Clint Eastwood's Chair: Ohioans React After Party Conventions

From Bill Clinton to Clint Eastwood, Northeast Ohio Democrats and Republicans answered questions on the two parties national conventions.

Northeast Ohio Republicans and Democrats don't agree on much, but they do have similar reactions to the recently concluded Republican and Democratic national conventions.

Bill Clinton's speech: Good.

Clint Eastwood and the chair: Bad.

GOP and Democratic insiders surveyed by Patch had generally favorable things to say about their candidates and the success of their own conventions. Patch received survey answers from 24 Democrats and 29 Republicans.

A majority of Republicans surveyed became more confident of Republican Nominee Mitt Romney's chances of winning Ohio in November and believed he made a strong case of becoming president at the GOP convention in Tampa.

"The story of the candidate and his family's personal background was effective," said Dale Petty, a Republican from Cuyahoga Falls. "I thought the conclusion of the acceptance speech was powerful - 'I want to help your family'."

Democrats were equally enthused after the Democrats convened in Charlotte. Those surveyed believed the party did a good job of giving President Barack Obama momentum to excite the base -- even if he was overshadowed by former President Bill Clinton.

"The speech by Bill Clinton really ignited the base and even got the Republicans to wish for the 'good ole days' of the Clinton Administration," said Democrat David Licate of Stow. He added later: "Mr. Clinton effectively framed the case for President Obama's re-election and skillfully attacked the Republican candidates."

Democrats and Republicans even found some positive words to say about each other's big shows.

Some Democrats thought that Ann Romney's speech was a positive message that did a solid job of humanizing the Republican nominee. Meanwhile, Republicans thought Clinton gave a good speech.

Of course, they found plenty to criticize about the other party's conventions too. Republicans criticized the Democratic blunder to leave God out of the party platform. Democrats slammed the GOP for Clint Eastwood's speech.

Overall, members of both parties felt that their conventions as a whole were successful. But Republicans believed that the convention would not have much effect on the outcome of the election. Democrats were more enthusiastic that their convention would help the president's election chances.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Patch will be conducting Red Northeast Ohio and Blue Northeast Ohio surveys throughout the election eason in hopes of determining the true sentiment of Republicans and Democrats on the ground in Ohio.

Our surveys are not a scientific random sample of any larger population but rather an effort to listen to a swath of influential local Republicans and Democrats. All of these individuals have agreed to participate in the surveys, although not all responded to this week's questions.
 
If you are an activist, party leader or elected official and would like to take part in a weekly surveys that lasts just a few minutes, please email Senior Regional Editor Jean Dubail at jean.dubail@patch.com

shewithnoname September 18, 2012 at 02:59 am
Jay,
So I suppose you are going to give equal condemnation to Obama's $1M donor, Bill Maher, right? http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/peoples-communities-cube/2012/sep/16/bigoted-anti-islam-filmmakers-name-revealed-bill-m/
PaulRevere September 18, 2012 at 06:10 am
Both speeches were by 2 actors.
Clinton's "finger" pointing is a "risque" gesture. And will be forgotten about after the election. He actually represented why Obama has failed. Saying no President could have us out of this mess was , of course an admission that Obama lied about reducing our debt in half and lied about keeping unemployment under 7% and lied about closing "Gitmo" and lied about GM Living, as it now struggles with just under 20% left of it's $50Bil and lied about Solar success (Why no mention of Solyndra Solar Co bankruptcy) ALL Failures of Obama. Now we have The whole mideast under fire and USA Ambassador Dead. Everything Obama has done has failed. Except one THING--The Military HE INHERITED Got OsamaBLaden. Yep it Took Clinton 1 hour to razzle dazzle HIDE real Failure. It was a speech of Failure--That is Failure to mention all the promises Obama "Failed" to achieve. When all speeches start with "I WILL DO_GIVE" You lose a little more freedom. It Took Eastwood 20 minutes to Verbally undress this President. This president makes a speech living in "mocking" his own people & country. It was fitting to see him being "mocked" by a True American Hero actor. Eastwood represented , why Obama should be Fired. nothing less. Absent from Duty, it depicted. The empty chair parody will be mentioned at every Future convention. It was a classic. For those of you who never heard of "vaudeville", That was it.
Dan Marol September 18, 2012 at 11:59 am
Joseph-
This for sure will be the nail in Romney's campaign coffin. He's already had a terrible week, and this just piles it on. I actually almost feel a little sorry for our Republican friends on the Patch today....
PaulRevere September 18, 2012 at 03:49 pm
It is about time America discusses the many "freeloaders" in that 47% of non-payers.
Democrats will lament having to actually defend their base that is in the 47% who do not pay 1 cent of their "FAIR SHARE" in taxes. Game on ! If Romney actually points out the Truth in what he says, many of those 47% will be revealed. 1)People who "fake" disabilities. 2)People who work on the side, while depleting our unemployment funds. 3)Young woman having children, hiding the real fathers, in order to live better than Working Mothers. The list is BIG! I am glad that the Truth about 47% comes out. 47% is bigger than 1%. Let's get back to fixing America. Our embassies are burning. Egyptian Flags have replaced our American Flag. (Did your local TV show that to you?) I have a message for All Democratic voters---You are Sickening in how you would watch our USA go up in smoke , just to Win an election. Diversion of this President's foreign policy is a "sin". Of course, many of you do not practice what you demand of others. It's a game of "gotcha". A Game where America loses either way. All of you in that 47% number know who you are. You will be the 1st to suffer , if a real exodus starts happening. What should be left, is the 47% of you who can "sponge" off yourselves. You will never understand that Mr Obama can support you only by "stealing" He steals by making loans he can't pay back. He steals by circumventing Bankruptcy laws to give GM billions of taxpayer money.
Murphy-Solon September 18, 2012 at 05:05 pm
My nephew is risking his life in Afghanistan every day. Current federal law exempts him from federal taxation. Mitt Romney just said that my nephew is a deadbeat looking for government handouts. This coming from a coward who refused to fight for his country in Vietnam Nam. This coward who grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth is the epitome of entitlement. You better get off your horse Paul Revere, he's a loser!!!
Tim September 18, 2012 at 05:20 pm
Um "Paulrevere" how does this 47% of Americans get out of paying sales tax? And gas tax" and SS tax? And State Taxes? And property taxes? Oh never mind you were just spamming old ads.
Kent4Life September 18, 2012 at 06:04 pm
Well voting for Romney is not the answer, which i hope that is not where you are going with the comment V. Scheurich
Kent4Life September 18, 2012 at 06:12 pm
Ireland,.Good example of Catholics killing over religion.....Lets just some it up....Religion equals people killing people. Religion has been a divider for humans for 100's of years! whether this video was made or not.....religion will be responsible for the death of humans for 100's of years to come.
MZ September 18, 2012 at 08:15 pm
Tim, I don't think that Romney with the aforementioned quote, or Obama when he speaks of the "rich" were referring to sales tax, gas tax, SS, state taxes or property taxes. I am fairly certain that they were referring to Federal Income Taxes. I am also fairly certain that PaulRevere was as well.
Are you disputing that 47% don't pay any Federal Income taxes? Sales tax and gas tax are a choice. Those that own property pay property taxes, those that rent do not (although I am sure it can be argued that the tax is included in the rent, unless they are on section 8). Do you pay SS tax is you are not making income? Murphy, I am fairly certain that Mitt wasn't referring to your nephew. Weren't there millions of liberals protesting the Vietnam war, dodging the draft, burning draft cards and the American flag, throwing medals away. I thought liberals hated the Vietnam war and spit on our soldiers.
Dan Marol September 18, 2012 at 09:21 pm
Go ahead, keep referring to the 47% who "don't pay taxes". Do you realize that tax law allows deductions such as mortgage interest, and child tax credits? When a working family makes under a certain amount of income, they end up paying no federal income tax after these deductions are applied. Men and women in the armed focres would also be part of this 47%, as Murphy said earlier. So these people are freeloaders? If you think that, then complain to congress to change the tax laws and get rid of the tax deductions on the middle class. Bottom line is that Romney has just completely insulted half of America, so if you think this is going to win you guys an election, good luck!
Garry Kanter September 18, 2012 at 09:28 pm
Editorial
Mitt Romney, Class Warrior - The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/19/opinion/mitt-romney-class-warrior.html?hp
Murphy-Solon September 18, 2012 at 10:47 pm
MZ, I can't speak for what liberals think. I can only offer my thoughts. Politics aside, Romney makes a lot of foolish gaffes. 44% of seniors on social security do not pay federal taxes. General Electric and many other corporations do not pay federal taxes. Romney himself pays a lower federal tax rate than most working stiffs. I understand he was just throwing out some red meat at a Republican fundraiser but he should be savvy enough to know, in this day and age of cell phones, that nothing is private in political fundraising today. MZ, it was the Republican party who feared having Romney as their eventual candidate during the primary season. I'm merely suggesting that I think those Reublican fears are being realized.
MZ September 19, 2012 at 12:24 am
All politicians have so called gaffes if they speak enough. Joe Biden is probably the world champion. Obama has had his fair share as well, the Joe the plumber incident, the bitter clingers, the you didn't build that, etc...
I do agree that Mitt was likely throwing out some Red Meat. In a futile attempt to explain it away, I would suggest that he was trying to draw a distinction between those that work and pay taxes and those that abuse the system. The ones abusing the system would have no reason to vote for Mitt or care at all about the tax rates. I think it is hard to argue that the takers are firmly in the Obama camp. I would also suggest that he probably didn't intend to include either seniors or military in his comments but he said what he said. I agree entirely with his point.
Murphy-Solon September 19, 2012 at 12:35 am
MZ, to say "the takers" are firmly in the Obama camp is just silly. I know plenty of Republicans who avail themselves of Medicaid to pay their nursing home costs. I know a number of Republicans over the past few years that have had their investment properties qualified Section 8 to save their rear ends. In fact, the states that receive more in federal assistance than they pay in taxes to the government are all southern red states. I don't know you, but, such a mass generalization is foolish on it's surface.
Murphy-Solon September 19, 2012 at 12:50 am
A further point to consider MZ. Romney polls badly with blacks and Hispanics. He also trails Obama significantly with women. For him to win the election, Romney must attract the "Reagan Democrats". You remember them don't you? Well he just told the "Reagan Democrats" to go pound salt. It doesn't matter if you're a moderate Republican or a far right Republican. That was a strategically foolish thing to do.
Dan Marol September 19, 2012 at 01:58 am
Murphy-
Your last post is exactly what I have been saying. Even if MZ and others loved what Romney said during the fundraiser, where will it get them in the election? If I was a Republican, I would be trying to figure out how we can expand the party, not shrink it even further. Oops, what am I saying? Let them keep doing what they've been doing!
PaulRevere September 19, 2012 at 05:24 am
Murphy & Tim:
Romney never called anyone a deadbeat. He just said 47% of the people do not pay income taxes. "That those people probably are Obama supporters". Listen to his tape. Now murphy, you call him a loser and coward , not for his country. Let me ask you, Did you see the 2001 Olympics here in the USA ? Did you see the whole Republican Natl Convention stage be filled with All the greatest Olympians of all time. Mike Erizioni (Hockey). Well , if you did not see that , YOU and YOUR NEPHEW Should. Summary: Our Olympics was in a shambles back then, Bankrupted with corruption. It was cancelled , and the whole USA was about to be the SHAME to the world. Do your know who the olympic committe called to SAVE THE GAMES. MITT ROMNEY. He saved the whole face of America then. He is as much a hero to this country as anyone who served. Certainly does not earn the trash talk of being called a coward. See the movie we all saw that night. The movie that Regular TV suppressed, because it displayed the Real Romney. See how he was praised by True American Heros from all walks of life. He saved the Atheletes lives and Families who busted their rears for 4 years preparation. Romney saved humiliation to ALL AMERICANS. NOW THAT IS A PRESIDENT YOU and every one of the readers here should want.
PaulRevere September 19, 2012 at 06:25 am
Dan: Since 1913 , Our tax laws allowed deductions. Always changing , of course.
We even had a high 80% tax rates back in 1980. Pre-Reagan. Tax laws back then allowed hundreds of deductions like all kinds of Interest on charge accounts and all sales taxes paid, any cattle feed costs paid up util Dec31st of each year. NO ONE PAID THE 80% rate. I know. But, only 20% of Americans did not pay any taxes for the reasons you list. Today , No taxes are due because of the many Tax credits given that never existed back when. We did not have anything like College credits. Child care credits, !st time homebuyer credits ($8,000 checks), Credits of $800 for anyone who just had a W-2, Hope andlearning credits for students, Earned income credits for single with children,Credits for IRA contributions. Today's credits are ALL CONSIDERED WELFARE PAYMENT STYLED. That is why America now has 47% of This country NOT PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE. Our Tax system has been used to Hide the billions of Welfare payments that by-pass congress. Obama has been doing this big-time right before your eyes. He has been Paying people off the Tax roles by all his hidden cost to society. That sir, is the Truth. Buy yourself a JK LASSER tax guide and look up CREDITS on income taxes. There you will see the greatest creation of welfare payments costing all of the 53% who do not get these credtis because their income exceeds $100,000. So don't try to spin a correct statement.
MZ September 20, 2012 at 01:02 pm
Murphy & Dan, are you arguing that more people shouldn't pay any federal income taxes? Would the US be better served if the number wasn't 47% and was 60%, or 70%?
I have been told numerous times that I should not be able to speak about abortions since I am not a woman and therefore can't have any opinion on women’s rights. Is it a fair analogy to extend that to paying federal income taxes? I am sure I will be vilified for this comment but, if you don't pay federal income taxes should you be allowed to have an opinion on how they are spent? If that is not the case, what prevents people from voting in those who will spend more on entitlements? At what point does the system break? I will agree, as I stated earlier, that Romney was throwing red meat and could have chosen his wording better. You would have to acknowledge that Obama has had many similar problems with word choices.
MZ September 20, 2012 at 01:03 pm
There is no doubt in my mind that a strong America is good for the world. America is better when hard work and entrepreneurship are appreciated and encouraged. An America where more people have some skin in the game and care more about how our tax dollars are spent is a better America. Less, not more people on entitlements is good for the country. I believe there should be strings attached to receiving most government “assistance.” If you are collecting unemployment, why is it bad to require those same people give back in some way, provide some service, pick up litter, paint over graffiti, do something?
America can be great again, not with low expectations, not with more “services”, but with the high expectations that Americans are expected to stand on their own, to work hard, to struggle, and to persevere.
Murphy-Solon September 20, 2012 at 02:13 pm
MZ, unlike a lot of political speakers, you seem a reasonable thinker. I'm impressed with the deep thought that embodies your comments. It's refreshing not to hear mere sound bites. I agree with you that assistance should be given in tandem with responsibility. I'm cognizant of those who game the system both in good and bad economies and have little patience for that ilk. I sympathize though with this new population that have sought government assistance since the 2008 financial meltdown. I've heard the stories of people in dire straits putting on sunglasses before they enter a food pantry so as not to be noticed by their neighbors. These folks aren't chronic abusers. I can't imagine how it must feel to suddenly find yourself w/o the ability to provide for ones family. I've seen grown men break down in tears on national television. These are not folks with the entitlement mentality. I know Romney thought he was speaking in a private context but it went public. To a "Reagan Democrat" , a voter mind you that Romney must attract, he seemed very cold. MZ, like it or not, campaigns are exercises in marketing.
MZ September 20, 2012 at 02:30 pm
Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what 53% of your country can do for you!
Jeff September 20, 2012 at 02:36 pm
Here's some more info on that:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/where-are-the-47-of-americans-who-pay-no-income-taxes/262499/
MZ September 20, 2012 at 02:58 pm
Murphy, it does seem that we agree on more than we disagree. I find that to be true when speaking with most people. We all want a better life, better America for our children, family, and friends. I also agree that Romney did appear to be cold in his statement. However, much as Obama shouldn't be judged on a single statement or sound bite, neither should Romney, or anyone else.
The fact is everyone has said something that they regret, something that didn't come out quite the way it was intended to. I will judge both Romney and Obama as I judge all politicians on their respective ideas, history, and records. Those who get too wrapped up in sound bites can fall for a great speaker with little to no depth, no ideas of their own, and can be swayed by words and not merit or accomplishments. These are difficult times in which we live. There are millions who through no fault of their own need assistance to make ends meet. I have no issue with them. I do take issue with the delivery methods of this assistance, with those that game the system, with the entitlement mentality that I see on display. I have no tolerance for those lining up for “Obama money”, for politicians promising pie in the sky visions of a benevolent government, or of additional government programs, especially federal programs. I give more in time and money than most to those less fortunate who are willing to work to make things better. I refuse to help those who won't help themselves.
Dan Marol September 20, 2012 at 04:06 pm
Jeff-
Great link. Thanks for pointing it out!
PaulRevere September 20, 2012 at 10:42 pm
MZ wins the most Intelligent Question Award on this comment board.
A Real American you are. Eastwood should ask the "empty chair" "Should people who do not pay any INCOME TAX, have the voting power to deplete the savings of those who earn more money? Should they have a Vote? Should American's earn the right to a vote? We all pay Soc security,medicare,sales taxes,, BUT we all do not Pay INCOME TAXES. (The Income taxes "ORIGINALLY" used only for Building, roads, bridges and a constitutionally mandated DEFENSE) So why are those 47% not even contributing to the bare needs of this country? Hey! Mr Revere, better watch your somewhat imputed "Dictator" comments. Where is the Individual rights in "ALL" American citizens? Must we analyze each and every individual case in America , in order to agree on the definition of fairness. I have reached the point of telling every one of those 47%--"Frankly, my friends, it's time to now get the rest of the 53% to a Zero Income tax. Now, that would be a Great America-- A Totally Free Country. Keep what you make and contribute as much you can to Yourself. Now, would we all like to vote on a ZERO Income tax rate for all Americans earning under $50,000 and a 20% rate for ALL other Americans. Pure Simple No exceptions, No sad stories. If you earn it---Support your America. Then , let's see how many Freebies and "Mr candy-man" Presidents we would support. The empty chair even votes on this one.
MZ October 13, 2012 at 08:23 pm
Jay, I am sure you have been keeping up on the news lately. It would appear that Benghazi had nothing to do with a film after all. It looks like they simply hate Americans and want to kill them. They would kill you too if given the chance.
Still want to ban free speech?
Colter95 November 4, 2012 at 04:24 pm
`·· ¤* ¤* ¯`*°º·¤* ¤* ¯`*°º·¤.¸
___====______________====_________, |[___][___][___][___][___][___][___][___] |_\ | //////////// ★ Mitt Romney ★ ////// [۞]|__\ | #45 //////// »→ Real Change»→ //////////// [۞]||__|... \'''''''' (Θ) (­­­­­­Θ) '''''''''''­'­''­­­''''''­'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' (­­­­­­Θ)[۞]|__/. \☻/
Colter95 November 4, 2012 at 04:24 pm
Wrong on the economy, wrong on Benghazi, and wrong on the auto bailout... The time for real change is NOW!!
http://www.policymic.com/articles/14285/obama-lies-obama-auto-bailout-did-not-rescue-detroit http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-outsourcer-overreach/ http://twitchy.com/2012/10/23/obama-lies-about-romneys-position-on-auto-bailouts-conservatives-hit-back/ http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2012/10/26/letterman-slams-obama-auto-bailout-lie-followed-maddow-parroting-same- Romney/Ryan 2012
Mike Chubre November 4, 2012 at 04:26 pm
Bill Clinton is a National Treasure.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Solon Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something