patching...
Breaking: Case Closed In Police-Involved Shooting; No Action Taken Against Officers »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATE: USDA, Ohio Wildlife Officials to Brief Safety Committee on Deer Issues

Officials from both agencies will be on hand Wednesday to talk deer management with Solon's safety committee

 

UPDATE 9:21 A.M. WEDS: 

Solon Public Works Commissioner Jim Stanek said officials from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Ohio Division of Wildlife will be on hand Wednesday to talk deer management issues with the Safety and Public Properties Committee.

Stanek said he expects the state wildlife officer will review with the safety committee urban deer management issues across the state. The USDA offers its own comprehensive deer management solution, and Stanek expects officials from that agency to brief the committee on what they can offer Solon.

-----

With another discussion on deer management scheduled for Wednesday's meeting of the Safety and Public Properties Committee, Solon officials are considering their options for counting deer.

Last month, the committee expressed interest in conducting an aerial survey of the deer population, a step the city had taken in 2004 and 2005 before initiating a culling program. 

The city animal warden has been keeping annual counts of the deer herd, and officials have said an aerial survey would provide another piece of information to get a handle on the animal numbers before the city decides on a comprehensive deer management program.

In a memo to the safety committee, Public Works Commissioner Jim Stanek said he has been in discussion with the Ohio Division of Wildlife, which must give the go-ahead for deer management programs, on proper ways to conduct an aerial survey.

Stanek said his research shows that a thermal count, which the city used in 2004 and 2005, would cost an estimated $30,752. 

A second method, called a "site-count aerial survey," would take more time before the city could conduct it and wouldn't be a viable option to do in the next few months.

Stanek has promised to present a recommended comprehensive deer management program by May 1. In the memo, he explains the level of research he has done.

"During the past month I have spent much time reviewing deer management issues including but not limited to habitat control, contraceptives, aerial surveys, and various hunting programs, as well as detailed, comprehensive programs that are being conducted by other communities in and outside the state of Ohio," Stanek wrote. "Throughout the next several months I will share this information with the committee as we move forward in developing the City's program."

Related Topics: Deer Management, Solon, and jim stanek

Rich

7:16 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

I hope this so called "count" is a little more realistic than the one conducted by the the animal warden , G. Miller ,whose methodology seems to have consisted of him sitting on his butt in a pick up truck. The numbers he gave (600-700 ??) seem a little out of whack considering two Solon property owners with large tracts on wooded land told me they haven't seen any deer; that is NONE.

Reply

Maria Gore

10:58 am on Monday, March 7, 2011

Here in Thornbury Development,I've seen so many deer. The other day I saw one limping, left front leg. They have eaten everything in the back & tree trunks have been sawed so much by antler rubbing. If I don't see them physically, I still know that their there. It looks like a jigsaw puzzle with their footprints all over the snow. Last year ,summer time,I had a buck crash into my front window, house shook ,ran outside to find the guys cutting the grass outside laughing. They explained what happened....even have one of his antlers to prove it. ( wonder what his MaMa said when he got home!) Thumbs up from me for deer management. Why not have some Solon men or women ,that are hunters, who know what they are doing?! That would save the city money.

Reply

TS

2:00 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I am sure the deer would like to have some "human management," especially in the Thornbury Development, which was all deer country until some greedy developers got the idea that Solon needed more McMansions. They now sit unfinished and home to Meth labs. I guess you reap what you sow, Maria. BTW- "why not have some Solon men or women, that are hunters, who know what they are doing?!" is not even a complete sentence? Did you complete the 5th grade?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Chris Mazzolini

2:04 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Everyone, let's keep the discussion respectful and civil. No lobbing personal insults at other posters. Thanks for your cooperation.

Comment_arrow

Maria Gore

5:27 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

It is one thing to state your opinion one way or the other, but to resort to such childish rhetoric as "did you complete the 5th grade?, only demonstrates what little class you possess. At least have the guts to put your whole name and not just initials. As a resident of Thornbury, I do see the deer daily and understand that this was at one time their habitat, but now it is a safety issue for the deer and the community. Whether you believe these "McMansions", as you refer to these homes that we have worked hard for, should not have been built is a moot point, because you need to deal with the situation at hand and not what-ifs. I respect others' opinions no matter if they agree or disagree. Apparently you choose to strike back with foolish questions and disrespect. Others responded with their differing views from mine, but certainly did it with a great deal more class and respect.

Larurel Alexander

3:51 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Greg Miller who is on the payroll of the city of Solon has done the count. Hellooo. Furthermore Miller has a Nuisance business where he captive bolts deer in Pepper Pike and traps and kills-oh sorry, dispatches animals in Punderson State Park. Conducting a ground count or distance sampling-as its correctly called- is a very precise science, performed by experienced biologists/scientists. What qualifications does Miller have? The following questions are vital factors one needs to know to obtain accuracy.
What methodology are you using?
Is it random or stratified?
How do you account for double counting?
How do you account for deer coming in and out of the neighborhoods and neighboring cities?
What percent of the count is this?
What is the standard error and confidence interval for your count?
What is your formal training or those conducting the counts?
I think its only right that he answers these questions. Furthermore, professionals know that distance sampling is far more accurate than an aerial count. In previous years the aerial count included Glen Willow. No one could say why. To inflate? Can hardly wait to see the dog and pony show put on by the USDA Wildlife Services and ODNR-State run hunting club. WS is the gov agency that kills one million animals and spends 100 million of our tax dollars annually. If they aren't killing animals they aren't being paid. They're the agency that recently poisoned all those birds that just mysteriosly fell fron the sky.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John

4:34 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

This years count will also include Glenwillow to be consistent with last time according to Stanek's memo. I don't understand why they'd count their deer too. And at $30K, why are they doing a count when they already are convinced they need to do something? If the count is low will they abandon the kill? Or will they use anecdotal guesses from peoples complaints?

Larurel Alexander

4:12 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Interesting that experts on non-lethal solutions are not only not being consulted with but also ignored. Experts on road deterrents, which are proven to work to prevent deer-vehicle-accidents, have contacted Solon admin but have been ignored. I guess I misunderstood that their comprehensive plan includes only lethal solutions. Poor Scott Peters (ODNR) He's been waiting so long to get hunters into Solon. When he goes from city to city trying to sell hunting to the residents he always brings up Solon. He tells them that Solon has spent thousands to pay sharpshooters and thats a quick fix but that needs to be followed bya long term hunting program. He says the key component is to get the public to agree to lethal and it is very difficult to do a deer count in Cuyahoga Ct. Urban deer kills are about hunter retention and recruitment. People are catching on and are angry at having hunting foisted on them. They think about that when they cast their votes.

Reply

Heinz Knall

5:09 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I wonder how many of the 922 deer that were counted in 2004 were actually Glenwillow deer and not Solon deer? What would be the purpose of counting deer in a neighboring community other than to inflate the numbers. Using that logic why not also include the deer in Bainbridge, Twinsburg, Reminderville, Oakwood, Moreland Hills, Bentleyville and Bedford Hts? I mean if you want some really high deer counts, that's what I would do!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heinz Knall

9:03 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

I did ask the question at the Council Meeting tonight, why are we counting deer in Glenwillow when it's a Solon deer problem? While they did admit to counting deer in some of the adjacent communities for the purpose that I might best describe as measuring the "deer reservoir", Mr Stanek said that the Glenwillow deer were not included in the Solon deer count. It would be interesting to see the results of deer counts held over a period of several years, without culling, to see where the population levels off.

Patch_comments_icon

Chris Mazzolini

9:14 pm on Monday, March 7, 2011

Thanks for reporting back, Heinz! Beat me to it!

Reply

Larurel Alexander

9:28 am on Tuesday, March 8, 2011

You are so correct Heinz-Solon is again shooting first and asking questions later. Their minds have been made up and now they're making everything fit to justify the continuation of their failed pogram. Deer and most species are self-regulating. If the environment cannot support a certain number of deer a doe will reabsorb an embryo among other things. Solon officials are so arrogant and so hell-bent on killing that they think they are the lords and masters over nature. They have also underestimated the intelligence of their constituents who are capable of deductive thinking. After 5 long years of killing resulting with the same problem people are starting to say, hey wait a minute here. They're also wondering who stands to gain. Why do Solon admin want to keep the residents in the dark about long-term, sceince-proven, cost-effective non-lethal solutions? Why is council withholding this vital information? Is that good government? People don't like to be made fools of and especially when it involves their hard earned money. I think we need to elect new people that truly have the resident's best interests at heart.

Reply

Lucy McKernan

1:56 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

When the USDA agent presented at last night's safety committee meeting, he was asked by one rez "what have either you at USDA or the Div. of Wildlife ever done to help animal? Have you done anything to help them" The USDA official only could offer one example; unfortunately for him, it was probably the worst possible example. I know for a fact raccoon rabies was eradicated, either completely or virtually, over the past few years. I know this because I researched it last year. His only response to her question was, "We've been helping raccoons by using vaccines." But part of that probably means testing, whereby the kill them and cut off their heads for testing; not sure if that's what they're doing, but even if only admin. vaccines, it's not necessary. There were no other answers to her question. Most appalling, when O/DOW said any sharpshooting or large scale plan is used, there should first be in place immediate follow up plan of action to keep numbers down. Solon not only did not do this, they didn't even know they were supposed to. They shot first, and asked questions later -- $575K and 1,500/1,600 dead deer later; as predicted, they've rebounded. Somebody should intervene and take away their authority over this because they aren't doing it in a logical, cost-effective, comprehensive, systematic, and last but not least, humane, way. Solon needs to submit to real experts, nonlethal ones. Let's see if they keep their promise to do so.

Reply

Larurel Alexander

9:39 pm on Thursday, March 10, 2011

I was thoroughly entertained at last night's stunning performance. Do you think Mr. Russo and Scott Peters (ODNR) rehearsed or just ad-libbed? Either way they should have coached the Wildlife Services agent who frankly sounded, er, unprepared. I'm sure he was caught off guard when the truth about what Wildlife Services does was exposed. He would have sounded much more professional if he would have expounded on the many poisons they use, the aerial shooting, snaring and other killing methods. I'm sure the audience would have liked to hear about the thousands of birds they just poisoned to help a farmer. Thank goodness we have them to protect us from such life-threatening situations.

Reply

Leave a comment